Can a layman understand?

15 IEEE Article on "Catt's Anomaly" , also here . Catt’s reply, 2  "Conflation", Pieraccini's text book , “Fondamenti di Elettronica”. The Pieraccini Anomaly ; P1 v P2 ; Monica Pasin 1 ; 2 ; The butchered version of Catt’s reply; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x72x1.html

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x72x2.html ;

 http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7839341 , 2 , http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7839349 , 2 ,hidden in the “Historical Section”. It is very interesting that "The Catt Question" is now again merely historical, while the original defamatory article was contemporary. This is the first time for 30 or 50 years that Catt has managed to get anything published in an IEEE journal. "The Catt Question" itself could never be published in an IEEE or IET journal.

 English , 2, 3. The Answer . My comments . Professor Giuseppe Pelosi 2 3 4 ; Letter to IEEE Editor and Pelosi  Stephen Crothers 2 3 ; Ad hominem ; Stone ; Sir Michael Pepper ; Professor Morgenthaler ; Dr. Ross Stone ; IEEE Code of Ethics ; Ian Freckelton 2 ; Caught in the Headlights ; Josephson ; H J Josephs biography of Heaviside ; Sisi ; Challenge ; Marco Delogu ; Caught in the Headlights ; The Italians contradict themselves

 

Physics Education article ; My reply , 2 , Will they comment? ; A reply rejected for publication ; The editor refused to publish my reply , and then refused to publish 30 words giving the www address for my reply. Complaint to the IoP Chief Executive

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5aw.htm

http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x28b.htm

 

 

Harry Ricker 1 2

 

IEEE Code of Ethics ; 2, 5, 7, 8, 9

 

cattq in 2,000

 

The smoking gun

 

Professor W A Gardner , 2 , 3