This is at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6ct.htm
In 2009 Ivor Catt wrote;
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/9511.htm (with additions)
The first duty of a Science Establishment careerist footsoldier is to not admit to ever having heard of a heretic. Failing that, the second is to never read any heresy. Failing even that, the third is to falsely claim he has never read heresy. (Catt is "on the Index ".) If an Establishment footsoldier should get involved with a heretic, he will be disowned by The Establishment. There is no loyalty within the Establishment.
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x67w3.htm http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x67w4.htm
Professor Massimiliano Pieraccini’s novel is later, 2011; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.htm
His alter ego Massimo says; “M «Are you kidding?» “Nobody with an ounce of common sense
would risk their career and scientific reputation to study the Catt anomaly”
Massimo thought, “and even if they were spending time on this, they
wouldn’t be telling people about it”.” His novel was promoted
by his
associate in Florence University, Professor Pelosi, Associate
Editor of the IEEE journal, who says he was responsible for publishing the
IEEE’s Pieraccini article which defames Catt. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf
Pelosi also defamed Catt. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x59v.pdf ”.... outside of academia
and structured research”.
Pieraccini covers his tracks; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x54c.pdf
- “Catt
probably misinterprets the concepts of charge and field.” This should placate
the Science Establishment, for whom Catt did not exist for 30 or 50 years, and
should have continued to not exist. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x5cz2.htm
Why is Catt not paranoid? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x21n.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3AIvor_Catt/archive4
“Catt is
certainly paranoid and ignorant,” - Nigel Cook