http://async.org.uk/IvorCatt-edited.html
https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/outreach.html “…. What are we made of? ….” Does it include E?
https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/outreach.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHVwA2UdA_o
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong1.htm
Comment please.
Recorded
delivery 15.3.2020
Professor
David Tong,
Trinity
College,
Cambridge
CB2 1TQ
https://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/em/electro.pdf
Figure 12 ;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVuKyZ4pBzg
;
https://blog.usejournal.com/qubits-explained-4e75bc7b1b6d
Dear
Professor David Tong,
David Tong. Professor of Theoretical Physics Fellow of Trinity College . (My and Newton's college.)
We need
comment by you on the results of W1 thru W4. Can they be explained within the
confines of classical electromagnetism, within the assertion that a charged
capacitor has a stationary electric field?
I used
the Tektronix 109 pulse generator shortly after 1963. The manual says that when
a cable was connected to a 1m coax cable charged to 8v, a 2m 4v pulse was
emitted. No explanation was ever given. http://ivorcatt.co.uk/x212.pdf
Some
decades later I surmised that the 1m cable charged to 8v contained 4v
continuously travelling to the right, and 4v travelling to the left.
A few
decades more later, Tony Wakefield, now in Australia, got in touch with me, and
following my instructions, for the first time looked inside the 1m charged
cable while it was discharging. The experimental results indicated that before
being discharged, energy was continuously reciprocating from right to left and
back. (As Professor Yekovlev said some decades later,
in his Royal Soc. article;
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm ; that there is no such a thing as a static electric field
in a capacitor. http://async.org.uk/IvorCatt-edited.html
The first
Wakefield Experiment was published without peer review in 2013. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf .
There was no comment on these results. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x344.htm
Five
years later, the results of what we now call "Wakefield 1" or W1 were
published in the Royal Society by guest editor Professor Yakovlev FIEEE. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm .
(Full article here; https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2017.0449 )
There are
now four Wakefield experimental results, W1 thru W4.
Wakefield explained.
W1 Connect a long 50 ohm coaxial
cable to a 1 metre cable charged to +8. Out comes a 2m 4v pulse.
W2 Connect long cables to both ends. Out of each end comes a 1m 4v
pulse.
W3 Connect a short circuit to one end of a 1m cable charged to 8v. The
cable alternates between +8v, 0v and -8v.
W4 Connect a short to both ends of a 1m cable charged to 8v. The
midpoint alternates between +8v and -8v.
All these results indicate that a long “steady” charged capacitor is not
steady at all. It contains ExH energy
continually travelling from left to right and back again at the speed of light.
No second accredited expert worldwide will comment on the results. Those
approached total about 30. Professor Alex Yakovlev of Newcastle University
published the result of W1 in the Royal Society, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm Transactions
A, “.... that there is no
such a thing as a static electric field in a capacitor.” https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rsta/376/2134 ,
and correctly predicted the results of W3 before it was conducted.
W1 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf ;
W2 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x3a922.pdf ;
W3 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85jalex2.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x854w3.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b1w3.JPG ,
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x84swak.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85qalex0.htm , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b1alex2.pdf ,
W4 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b2w4.jpg , 25% http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b2w41.jpg ,
Earlier, there was analysis of my IEEE 1967 paper . http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x147.pdf
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x111.htm
Ivor Catt 10.3.2020
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm
Ivor
Catt,
121
Westfields,
St.
Albans AL3 4JR
10.3.2020
01727
864257
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
To Robert.DeMelloKoch@wits.ac.za
Dear
Professor,
The Heaviside-Maxwell
equations seem innocent enough. We have the mathematics
"formalising", or making more rigorous, the physics.
But
science is thought to proceed via conjecture, experiment, and confirmation or
rejection of the conjecture. Then Maxwell appeared to build a rigorous
bedrock on which could rest the physics or the real world. This maths was built
on the symbols below, D, B, E, H.
But
supposing an experiment (Wakefield) led to the conclusion that one of those
terms, E, did not exist?
The only
available explanation we have of the four Wakefield experimental results is, to
quote the Royal Society, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm , that there is no such a thing as a static electric field
in a capacitor. According to Wakefield, there
only exists ExH travelling a speed c, for which
perhaps we do not have a symbol. So all the
mathematical paraphernalia built on D, B, E, H is flawed, not related to
physical reality. Or do you have an explanation of the Wakefield results which
is compatible with classical electromagnetism's stationary field, based on E
etc.?
I shall
add your comments at the end of http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/tong2.htm
Ivor Catt
+44
(0)1727 864257
There are now four Wakefield experimental results, W1 thru W4.
Wakefield explained.
W1 Connect a long 50 ohm coaxial
cable to a 1 metre cable charged to +8. Out comes a 2m 4v pulse.
W2 Connect long cables to both ends. Out of each end comes a 1m 4v pulse.
W3 Connect a short circuit to one end of a 1m cable charged to 8v. The
cable alternates between +8v, 0v and -8v.
W4 Connect a short to both ends of a 1m cable charged to 8v. The
midpoint alternates between +8v and -8v.
All these results indicate that a long “steady” charged capacitor is not
steady at all. It contains ExH energy
continually travelling from left to right and back again at the speed of light.
No second accredited expert worldwide will comment on the results. Those
approached total about 30. Professor Alex Yakovlev of Newcastle University
published the result of W1 in the Royal Society, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/yak.htm Transactions
A, “.... that there is no
such a thing as a static electric field in a capacitor.” https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rsta/376/2134 ,
and correctly predicted the results of W3 before it was conducted.
W1 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x343.pdf ;
W2 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x3a922.pdf ;
W3 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85jalex2.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x854w3.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b1w3.JPG ,
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x84swak.pdf , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85qalex0.htm , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b1alex2.pdf ,
W4 http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b2w4.jpg , 25% http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b2w41.jpg ,
Earlier, there was analysis of my IEEE 1967 paper
. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x147.pdf
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x111.htm
Ivor Catt 10.3.2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=an8fWwECJVM
https://www.dur.ac.uk/ias/fellows/1213/demellokoch/
His projects have been supported by the Royal
Society and by the National Research Foundation of South
Africa
https://mg.co.za/article/2014-07-11-00-the-building-blocks-of-scientific-enquiry/
De Mello Koch maintains that
even developing countries need fundamental scientific research, because the
knowledge and discipline created in the process feed directly into applied
research.
