When a long capacitor charged to +8v is shorted
at both ends,
the mid point
alternates between +8v, -8v, +8v, -8v ….
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b2w4.jpg
Uncompromising, indefatigable
pursuit of truth, then, is the hallmark that distinguishes science from the
charlatan. It constitutes the indispensible ethic of
modern science. (Max Born) – and of course Chris Spargo.
Wikipedia says Born said exactly the
opposite. Double check your facts, Catt! Or Wikipedia? –
21.11.2019
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x0804.htm
Chris,
By pressing me for access to the politics
of CERN breaking rank and saying a capacitor does not have a stationary
electric field, you risk sullying your reputation as, not a dedicated
scientist, putting aside career and pursuing scientific advance. The true
scientist will of course investigate, and comment on, the Wakefield 3 picture I
have supplied, rather than on what CERN may or may not have said. That is, for
you and me, scientific advance is more important than politics and career.
You provided the very important added idea
that I might be lying (which idea did not occur to me), and that CERN did not
now say what was outside the canon. The approach of trying to find out how and
whether CERN now suggests the revolutionary idea that a
charged capacitor does not have a stationary electric field rather than enthusiastically investigating the Wakefield 3 picture
would not be the move of a scientist, but that of a full blooded careerist,
which you are not.
“I am their leader; I must follow them.”
CERN and LIGO have to keep the money flowing (one billion per year, half a
million for each member of staff, dwarfing the IET) by making new discoveries.
There is the risk that they will move downmarket from big bang, gravity waves
and the like, ousting the IEEE/IET by moving closer to the source of their
money, the taxpayer, by meddling in fundamentals, like electromagnetic theory.
A careerist has to watch for any change in the dogma of “Modern Physics” so as
to not get caught out saying the wrong thing. Also, as a senior member of the
IET, you need to warn them if there is a threat that the party line could have
to change to keep up with CERN/LIGO. CERN cannot be allowed to get ahead of IET
over the IET and IEEE’s bread and butter, electromagnetic theory. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x84swak.pdf
; [ http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x854w3.pdf
] . I think I sent you the actual picture, but cannot send it to you again
because of computer troubles [now solved]. That will come later. However, you
can of course take my word that the actual pictures are the same as my
prediction at x84swak. Charge a cable to 8v. Short at one end. The cable then
goes into a number of states; all 8v, all of it 0v, all of it -8v, then later
back to all of it 8v, and all over again. Even when discharging from +8v into a
20 ohm resistor, the cable surprisingly passes through a negative stage.
Imagine a capacitor, while discharging (exponential?) passing through negative!
Surely CERN will not meddle with that! Do they not realise the implications?
These Wakefield pictures do too much damage to careers and reputations. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x6611.htm
Wakefield 1 is bad enough, and W3 must be
blocked for another decade or two. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8b1w3.JPG
. Now W4! http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85jalex1.pdf
. Now W4. An 8v discharging capacitor vacillating between +8v, -8v, +8v,
-8v, …. ? Highly heretical. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85qalex0.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x85jalex1.pdf
As a true scientist, you are not concerned
with such things, and will be anxious to investigate, and comment on, the
Wakefield 3 picture. The same goes for the FIEEE and FIET men Alex Yakovlev and
Tony Davies. I anxiously look forward to the written comment from each of you,
if only the remark that your skills do not extend to interpreting the x84swak
picture, in which case sending me to the expert who is able to comment. You
know who they are, because you are severally FIEEE etc.
Ivor Catt. 4.5.2018
|
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
|
Apr 29 (5 days ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
Let us have a link to the paper by your reported CERN man?
On Sun, 29 Apr 2018, 21:30 Ivor Catt, <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
wrote:
Fascinating.
Supported by their members, who do not want the disruption caused by
major scientific advance, the IEEE and IET do not publish major advances, or
even rather minor ones like the fact that a capacitor does not have a self resonant frequency, or that a capacitor is a
transmission line.
At the other pole, the CERN scam has gobbled up perhaps $20,000,000,000 , and needs to have something to show for it
beyond "gravity waves" [and suchlike,,e.g. Higgd Boson]
Caught in the middle are the IEEE and IET, who have to stabilise the
knowledge base. They block all of Catt's work.
A CERN man, "FN", has stolen some
important Catt work, the assertion that a charged capacitor does not have a
stationary electric field. The thief is in the same issue as Catt in an
unrefereed journal, in which in another issue of the journal the unrefereed
idea was promoted by Catt decades ago. Now CERN steals it to help justify their
money spend. Obviously Professor Tony Davies FIET, Life Fellow IEEE,
FRI, MBCS, CEng and Professor Alex Yakovlev (similar, FIEEE etc. etc.) unwittingly
connive in this plagiarism. By their inaction they get themselves into deep
water. twixt the devil (IEEE members) and CERN. Tony and Alex need to be told
that they help CERN to keep their torrent of money flowing.
Ivor Catt
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
|
May 4 (8 days ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
I have almost set up this experiment (a length of RG59 coax, 4x measurements
along length using a 100MHz tektronix digital 4
channel scope, shorting via a momentary push to make switch) and plan to
perform it next week. I will post online in due course.
On Fri, 4 May 2018, 20:30 Ivor Catt, <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
wrote:
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x854spargo.htm
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
|
May 2 (2 days ago)
|
|
||
|
||||
Still no CERN paper reference!
On Wed, 2 May 2018, 19:11 Ivor Catt, <ivorcatt@gmail.com>
wrote:
I did manage to upload this thing after all. Catt, and now CERN, find
that a supposedly steady charged capacitor with electric field between the
plates is not steady at all. All 14 year old children round the world are being
taught what is false. Otherwise, please explain the picture within the
framework of classical electromagnetism, with its stationary electric field.
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x842short.pdf
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/965.htm
We are driving towards the principle that
Energy (current) E x H cannot stand
still; it can only travel at the speed of light.
Any apparently steady field is a combination of two energy currents
travelling in opposite directions at the speed of light.
Ivor Catt
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x84n.pdf