Matthew 13:4-9 New International Version (NIV)
4 As he was scattering the seed, some fell along the path, and the birds came and ate it up. 5 Some fell on rocky places, where it did not have much soil. It sprang up quickly, because the soil was shallow. 6 But when the sun came up, the plants were scorched, and they withered because they had no root. 7 Other seed fell among thorns, which grew up and choked the plants. 8 Still other seed fell on good soil, where it produced a crop—a hundred, sixty or thirty times what was sown. 9 Whoever has ears, let them hear.”
The instrumentalists who today control what was “science” have no roots – History of Science, Philosophy of Science, Sociology of Science.
Digital electronics (1965) was the sun. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm . They kept in the shade as long as they could, which was more than half a century.
The End of Science
The enemies of science, MICE, are fourfold; mathematicians, instrumentalists, careerists, EMC; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x19temc.pdf
"careerist" maps onto academia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waEc4YbQQX0 plus qualified "scientists". Thus, academia gives "qualifications" - bits of paper - which those "qualified" use to get jobs. which are gained by the parrots mastering old theory and, parrot-like, returning the old information (which is what the lecturers, reappearing as examiners, know) in exams. The exams classify the parrots for the right jobs and status, in academia and elsewhere. Those qualified, with their bits of paper, pay membership to institutions which publish “peer reviewed”, that is “consensus” material, and protect the qualifications by blocking scientific advances, only publishing decorations of old theory, consensus theory.
Education in Latin, the three R's, functioned reasonably in such a stable environment, where information and skills did not change rapidly. The 1890s move of illiterate farm workers from country to city factory massively increased the demand for the (stable) three Rs. It was not appreciated that science could not be articulated onto the educational system unless science was frozen.
The system would be threatened by, (and would protect itself by fair means or foul against) rapid changes in the information or skills. Initially resisting, academia stabilised "scientific" knowledge on the 1905 ideas of Pop Scientist Einstein, which became academic orthodoxy. The later Einstein 1970 was excluded as "senile". http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/9101.htm "We all of us have some idea of what the basic axioms in physics will turn out to be. The quantum or particle will surely not be amongst them; the field, in Faraday's and Maxwell's sense, could possibly be, but it is not certain." - Einstein in "The Born-Einstain Letters" by Max Born, pub. Macmillan 1971. p164. See "Nobel disease". https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nobel_disease ; http://www.ivorcatt.org/icrns86jun_0003.htm
The biggest shock was the sudden appearance of high-speed digital electronics in 1960. During the next half century, academia, already realising that change (and worst, scientific revolution) threatened it, completely shut the door on such drastic change - for example a signal from your computer telling your printer to print, which is not a sine wave. The only permissible signal, in Wikipedia and everywhere else, is the sine wave. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_line
In desperation, we organised lucrative seminars, and published a book. None of this material is in any university course today, nearly half a century later. http://www.ivorcatt.com/43.htm ; http://www.ivorcatt.org/digital-hardware-design.htm
The most fundamental physics is electromagnetic theory, and the canon collapsed when the signal changed from the sine wave to the step, or cattq http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm . http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2809.htm
Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.
- G. Orwell, 1984, pub. Chancellor, 1984 edn., p225
It is not that when presented with such a step, an academic blocks it, or suppresses it. He does not even see it, or comprehend it. The device used to blind him is called the Fourier Series. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourier_series By the time he is presented with cattq, http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm , he has undergone decades of brainwashing, called "education". A heavy part of the brainwashing is that only sine waves exist in the physical world. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91.htm "stated to me by Professor Howie, then Head of the Cavendish, that "Physical reality is composed of sine waves."" ; http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm
A Google search for "transmission line" + Fourier gives 500,000 hits. In every discussion of a transmission line, omega ω (= sine wave) appears unannounced and without any justification. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm
A series of accidents protected me from the full brainwashing, including the death of the tutor in Cambridge who was supposed to tutor me in electricity. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2809.htm
On leaving college and going to design one of the first digital computers, I asked my new boss Charlie Portman what I should read. He replied; "Nothing. It's all new." http://s3data.computerhistory.org/brochures/ferranti.sirius2.1961.102646235.pdf ; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferranti_Sirius
My brainwashing was imperfect, although I had the Cambridge bit of paper - a passport to any job.
Ivor Catt 7.10.2019 / 8.7.2020
06:26 (13 hours ago)
"What is needed to save science is the total obliteration the academic social class." -SC
That's a great start.
1. Yes, we are still awaiting a reply from Chris Palmer. He said he would get back to me several months ago- April. 21, 2019.
2. John Dore has failed to acknowledge that i=qc is a mainstream equation. He has also failed to retract his assertion that it is dimensionally incorrect.
3. Hawking is as fake as the Hawking brand. The 'actual' Hawking died in the mid-1980's. Non-speaking actors played the part ever since, until the fake death.
4. Steve, there is plenty of hope. All of this pomp & fakery shall be burned to the ground in the upcoming global wars which they have caused and prosecuted, Chris. Their destruction of Science is merely one aspect of it, John. All of their accolades and titles shall be mocked forevermore, Archie.
5. Whomsoever subscribes to the 'mainstream' view, on anything whatsoever, is a suspect. "They are judged accordingly."
6. For the larger picture, The Pleistocene Murders is completed-
The Pleistocene Murders
Part 1, Introduction
Part 2, The Spring of Life
Part 3, The Summer of Life
Part 4, The Autumn of Life
Part 5, The Winter of Life
Part 6, The Carbon Wars
Part 7, Judgment Day
There Will Be War,
From: Ivor Catt
Sent: Oct 6, 2019 9:34 AM
To: Steve Crothers
Cc: John Raymond Dore , Forrest Bishop , Alex Yakovlev , Archie Howie
Subject: Re: you or I?
(Hawking eqn. faulty) " Now that they know about it they have invoked the cone of silence." - S Crothers
I need your exegesis on my website, or the www address where you do the analysis, that the eqn. on Hawking's grave is faulty (specifically requested for his grave by Hawking). Remember I first heard of "intrinsic" and "extrinsic" a month ago, from you.
Bear in mind that John jumped on Forrest when John thought the eqn. i=qc was Forrest's. He backed off when it was pointed out to him that it was produced by an Oxford lecturer who got prizes for being the bestest and mostest lecturer. Everyone and his brother will not believe the eqn on Hawking's grave is faulty, and will try to shoot you down, as you know well. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x2bg.pdf
By the way, Palmer has failed to comment on cattq2 and cattq3. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x59q.htm
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 10:57, Steve Crothers <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Ten years ago I had a little hope. But now there is no hope. Science is a dead duck. Just look at the embarrassment of Hawking's gravestone equation. Now that they know about it they have invoked the cone of silence. The same goes for the non-existence of self resonant frequency of a capacitor and that a capacitor is a transmission line. To protect their careers and reputations the academics always ignore the truth and take measures to suppress it, including fraud. What is needed to save science is the total obliteration the academic social class.
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 7:42 PM Ivor Catt <email@example.com> wrote:
I had no recollection of writing this remarkable piece (91d below) 10 years ago. [ http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm ] When you said it to me recently, I thought it was completely new; the idea that it is too late to save science.
The enemies of science, I now realise, are threefold; the triumverate - mathematicians, careerists, instrumentalists. Together they control all the commanding heights of "science".
Of course, you do not have to keep to the blocking of "Theory C" (or actually D http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cbwash.htm ) . Come downmarket, and still important disclosures are blocked. For instance; "A capacitor does not have a self-resonant frequency". Even that is too threatening to the triumvirate. This block means that a lot of unnecessary capacitors are added to all circuit boards throughout the world, in order to save the canon.) http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2603.htm ; https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1135992 .
Tony Davies http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/ieeetonycard.pdf and I met his colleague in the IEE/IET HQ in London. Tony mentioned the idea that "A capacitor does not have a self resonant frequency". The colleague looked frightened, and ran away. I heard nothing more about it from Tony, ex board of directors of the IEEE. Are all these guys running so extremely scared? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x949.htm . Is Tony concerned about https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1135992 ? http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x8cktony.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91d.htm "The behaviour of all our institutions when confronted by "The Catt Question" delivers a bleak message for the future of science. Institutionalised failure to deal with "The Catt Question" and other fundamental lacunae threatens the survival of science." [e.g. the block on "A capacitor does not have a self resonant frequency.]
11:17 (9 hours ago)
Hawking's nonsensical gravestone equation is exposed here:
The terms in thermodynamics are 'intensive' and 'extensive', not 'intrinsic' and 'extrinsic'. The size of a sample has nothing to do with its temperature. Divide a uniform sample in thermal equilibrium into two equal parts. The temperature does not change, but the mass and the volume are halved - this is an experimental fact beyond dispute. Temperature is intensive, volume and mass are extensive. Now look at Hawking's gravestone equation. He has temperature varying inversely with mass. He violates both the 0th and the 2nd laws of thermodynamics, in which the intensive character of temperature is embedded. Cambridge is a laughingstock, writ large in stone in Westminster Abbey! Do you see any Cambridge dons admitting the invalidity of Hawking's gravestone equation now that it has been so clearly revealed to them and the world? Not a one. Cambridge is a fraud. And why did the Cambridge dons not see Hawking's violation of thermodynamic? Because they are incompetent. Here is another example of Cambridge dons' incompetence:
 Stephen J. Crothers and Pierre-Marie Robitaille, Presentation at Ohio Meeting 2019 of the American Physical Society: Stellar Mass-Luminosity and its Violation of Thermodynamics,
 Stephen J. Crothers and Pierre-Marie Robitaille,
Eddington’s Mass-Luminosity Relationship: A Violation of the Laws of Thermodynamics, OSS19 Meeting of The American Physical Society (F02.00005) March 30, 2019, http://vixra.org/pdf/1903.0563v1.pdf
 Crothers, S.J. and Robitaille, P.-M., Eddington's mass-luminosity relation and the laws of thermodynamics, Physics Essays, Vol. 32, No. 3, 2019,