Dear Hannah,
I expected to get no reply from you. I instinctively feel that nobody in
the Media at any level will touch the alleged problem of the impossibility of
further scientific advance. The loyalty of everyone in the media is to the
defunct mainstream science. That means the crisis will get deeper and deeper.
Ivor Catt 12 November 2014
From: Ivor
Catt
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 7:05 PM
To: hannah.devlin@thetimes.co.uk
Subject: Fw: peer
review etc.
Third copy.
From: Ivor
Catt
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2014 9:11 AM
To: hannah.devlin@thetimes.co.uk
Subject: Fw: peer
review etc.
Second copy.
From: Ivor
Catt
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 11:46 AM
To: hannah.devlin@thetimes.co.uk
Cc: neville.hodgkinson@uk.bkwsu.org
Subject: peer review etc.
Dear Hannah Devlin,
I spoke to you just now – Tuesday 15 July 10.30am.
I have worked in this subject area for more than thirty years, and find
it fascinating. My prediction is that no journalist of any colour will touch
it, but still I have approached you because of your article on p8, The Times, 3
July 2014; “Science Journal says sorry for stem-cell errors.”
The idea is that today’s professional science cannot allow paradigm
shift ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradigm_shift
) over something like phlogiston, caloric or electricity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phlogiston_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caloric_theory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity
During the time of the first two shifts, 1825, science was more the
amateur province of wealthy businessmen, but still the shifts took more than 25
years. 200 years later, even the possibility of paradigm shift with electricity
cannot be considered, or even the suggestion understood. http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/Y65BRILL.htm . Paradigm shift
does too much short and medium term damage to an entrenched professional. (In
the less extreme cases of AIDS or Climate Change, if HIV does not cause AIDS,
thousands of jobs will be lost.)
My idea is that you study my material briefly, enough to write a brief
“floater” article and see what the response is.
There is a precedent for this. Neville Hodgkinson,
who has stayed in my home, http://www.reviewingaids.com/awiki/index.php/Neville_Hodgkinson , was medical
correspondent for The Sunday Times. He published conventional articles on AIDS,
but then came across what are now called “AIDS Deniers” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS_denialism . He broached the
matter with the Editor, Andrew Neil, and they ran a trial article. The response
of the Science Establishment was extreme. The then Editor of “Nature” told
everyone to stop buying “The Sunday Times”. Andrew Neil dug his heels in, and
published numerous Hodgkinson articles for perhaps ten
years. Andrew Neil says their publication is one of his two greatest
achievements as Editor. The Sunday Times was the only media outlet in the
world for “AIDS Deniers”.
It is interesting that “The Sunday Times” has now returned to the
“Establishment” fold, and now publishes on AIDS as though Hodgkinson
and his articles did not exist. The dissident view has been erased from the
record. When I ask Sunday Times journalists why, they do not reply. Recently
the new Master of Trinity College, Cambridge, told me that it was right that
the leading AIDS dissident, Peter Duesberg, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Duesberg , should be suppressed
“or hundreds of thousands would die”. http://www.duesberg.com/
Turning to my case. No relevant professor or journalist
will give any written comment on published experimental results which point to
problems in classical electromagnetism. No relevant professor or journalist
will give any written comment on “The Catt Question”, an elementary question
about the details of classical electromagnetic theory. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x37p.htm . All you have to do
is find one or more accredited experts, and ask them for written comment on one
of these things. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x344.htm , http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x31j.htm
Ivor Catt
121Westfields,
St. Albans AL3 4JR
01727 864257
Some of my credentials.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7JYZviFH54
http://www.ivorcatt.org/digital-hardware-design.htm
http://www.electromagnetism.demon.co.uk/ipub002a.htm
http://www.big-lies.org/catt/ivor-catt-the-catt-concept.html
20pp peer reviewed article. http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x0305.htm
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/28anom.htm