Ivor Catt,

121 Westfields,

St. Albans AL3 4JR

England

+44 (0)1727 864257

28 September 2010

Simon Tse
Chief Executive
DVLA
Swansea
SA6 7JL.

Dear Mr. Tse,

False reporting to the DVLA by Hertfordshire Action on Disability

I welcome your new appointment. I hope you will resolve the problem below without recourse to legal action. I would be very happy to talk with you about the problem.

It is urgent for me to be given a Provisional Driving Licence.

It is most convenient to read this letter on the www at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/xx.htm to ease access to the hyperlinks.

Unless Annabelle Waterfield, Head of HAD, shows ( see 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 and 7 ) how the test report sent to the DVLA ( 6 and 7 ) can be reconciled with the actual test results ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 and 5 ) (which the DVLA did not receive), you should no longer use HAD. I look forward to hearing from you as to whether you will continue to use HAD.

I asked Annabelle Waterfield to look into the contradiction between their test results, which I only recently got hold of, and the totally opposite test report which HAD sent to the DVLA. This false report convinced your Dr. Hanley that I was a raving maniac who should not be allowed on the road with a provisional driving licence or even to have driving lessons. The report also misled my G.P. Dr. Ferguson. Your Dr. Hanley took his comments on it to be his own opinion, which they were not. Dr. Ferguson merely commented on the false report.

I asked Annabelle Waterfield either to show how the test results could be reconciled with the resulting report to the DVLA, or to send an amended report to the DVLA. She did not reply, but paid her lawyers to try to intimidate me 1 , 2 , 3, in a gross misuse of charitable funds.

Yours sincerely,

Ivor Catt

20 August 2010

Michael Bottomley,

Ewart Price Solicitors (for HAD),

Your ref. MBB/HAD/c010885.001

Dear Mr. Bottomley,

Thank you for your letter dated 16 August 2010.

Before taking legal advice, your client should have responded to my assertion on 3 August that "the final report of the assessment" totally contradicted "my scores in the medical test in the office (Cognitive Testing Marking Sheet)". I wrote; "The effect of this total contradiction has been very damaging. Please look into it." She should have had this done, and the conclusions reported to me.

Your client should show how the two can be reconciled now, before coming to court. As you know, the court does not look kindly on ambush.

My analysis of the situation is at http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x.htm

Yours sincerely,

(Ivor Catt)

Cc Margaret Peecock

Caseworker

Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman 

Millbank Tower

Millbank

London

SW1P 4QP

Cc Dr. James Ferguson,

Midway Surgery,

93 Watford Rd.,

St. Albans AL2 3JX

Cc Mr. Livingstone,

Watford General Hospital,

Vicarage Road,

Watford WD18 0HB

Cc Dr. J G G Hanley, Medical Adviser,

Drivers Medical Group,

DVLA, Swansea SA99 1TU

Your Ref. M14645260/Dyasonc

Cc Annabelle Waterfield, Hertfordshire Action on Disability,

The Woodside Centre, The Commons,

Welwyn Garden City, Herts, AL7 4DD.