Accountability in Science
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/x59596.htm 2015. My self-published book  "The Catt Anomaly" gives their contradictory replies,  , , and discusses their refusal to discuss their disagreement with each other or with us for the next 20 years. Thus, the confusion as to what their theory actually is, remains. Text books and universities continue to teach an internally contradictory theory. Does the man in the street believe that their behaviour, which continues today, is ethical? Remarkably, I find that he does. The man in the street thinks that someone like Sir Michael Pepper, having been “knighted for services to physics” has no further responsibility to help physics towards the truth, for instance by telling me he has changed his view on “The Catt Question”. [ http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2812.htm ] This general attitude in society rings the death knell for science.
The key question is, whether you will do one of the following; …. ….
No reply from Davies.
To Professor Alex Yakovlev;
1 Is there something fundamentally wrong with classical electromagnetism?
2 Is there nothing worng with classical electromagnetism? (See Spargo).
3 Are you not sure?
No answer from Yakovlev.
“There is no “Catt’s anomaly” – Professor Gian-Luca Oppo.
“Professor Oppo, please comment on cattq.” http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/cattq.htm . No answer.
Professor Pepper has refused to confirm Nobel prize winner Brian Josephson, who told me by email that Pepper had changed his mind on cattq, and was now a “westerner”.
In due course I will extend this extraordinary list.
in short, means protective
- G. Orwell, 1984, pub. Chancellor, 1984 edn., p225
Yes, that’s it,’ said the Hatter with a sigh: `it’s always tea-time, and we’ve no time to wash the things between whiles.’