The second advance in March 2010.


Comment on a minor advance in electromagnetic theory.



Three problems for classical electrodynamics. However, we should perhaps precede them and discuss an apparently reasonably innocent attempt to modify the orthodox dogma, which is also ignored/suppressed. See . This suggests that even relatively mild modifications to dogma are ignored/suppressed.


Self Resonant Frequency.

In we have a discussion of Wikipedia becoming an outpost of a censoring/suppression Establishment. This is surely a minor modification to Received Theory of Electromagnetism, but all the same it is suppressed. This warns us that the suppression of major advances by Catt is not because they are major. Even the assertion that a capacitor has no internal series inductance, and therefore no self resonant frequency, is suppressed.

I have also asked the Editor on the leading journal, Proc.IEEE, for advice on how to get this information to members of the IEEE. He does not reply.

Ivor Catt   16 March 2010

He agre



Crosstalk (Noise) in Digital Systems

Pages 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , some of which is in two of my books. The argument starts at page 30 of one book , and at page 4 of the other book , continuing on page 55 . Here in figure 9.2 we see “a very narrow pulse introduced at the front end of the active line. If there were no parallel passive line nearby, this pulse would travel down the active line (at the speed of light for the dielectric) more or less unchanged,” in a TEM mode. “However, as the other two traces show, the presence of the passive line caused the original narrow pulse to break up into two similar pulses.”