|
18 May 2009
Dear Lord Rees, Brian Josephson, Sir Michael Pepper, Chief Executive IET,
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/91.htm
, which is published in "Electronics World" in May 2009, page 16, http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/657c1927#/657c1927/16
. calls for a reply from you. This could be by email
to the editor Svetlana at SvetlanaJ@stjohnpatrick.com or at Nexus Media
Communications, Media House, Azalea Drive, Swanley, Kent BR8 8HU.
The following are extracts from "Electronics World";
"It took some years to get any response at all from leading academic
luminaries or from the relevant learned institutions, but in the end I got
response from Sir Michael Pepper FRS , and from Dr. Neil McEwan, Reader in Electromagnetism, later
replaced by Nobel Prize Winner Brian Josephson. Pepper and Josephson are both
Professors at The Cavendish, and both Fellows of Trinity College, Cambridge.
In their replies, they totally contradicted each other."
"I took this contradiction to the Master of Trinity College, Lord Rees,
asking him to do something about it in his administrative capacity. He
replied that "I shall however need to get 'up to speed' on the
scientific question you raise before being able to respond intelligently ....
". I replied that I approached him in his
administrative capacity, not in his technical capacity. That was three years
ago, and he has done nothing." [Nothing in 2018]
"But here we arrive at the core problem, which extends far beyond
electromagnetic theory. Lord Rees, Josephson, Sir Michael Pepper have no
inkling that with reputation comes responsibility. They have no grasp of the
fact that given their high reputation and administrative responsibility, they
have a duty to do something to resolve the problem which has arisen, that
leading experts totally contradict each other on a rudimentary detail of
electromagnetic theory."
A year ago, Josephson reported in an email that Pepper (a southerner) now
agrees with him (a westerner). However, this is insufficient, for a number of
reasons. First, is necessary for Sir Michael Pepper (southerner) himself say that he now agrees with the Josephson, westerner
position. Then we would move on to bring forward the other remaining
southerners, including Bas Lago, reviewing my book for the IEE (now IET)
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/9_review.htm where he writes; "The charges
come to the surface to help the wave go by and then pass the task to other
charges further along the line which are already there and waiting. This is
the mechanism of guidance and containement.", which is the 1993 Pepper southerner position, as
he wrote in 1993,
http://www.ivorcatt.co.uk/2812.htm
. This Pepper would have to repudiate, in writing. More generally, since Sir
Michael Pepper was chosen by the then Master of Trinity to write on "The
Catt Question", an email from someone else saying that he has changed
his position is insufficient. What Pepper wrote is in the Trinity College
library in a published book; "The Catt Anomaly". It has to be
properly repudiated, and we can then move on to Bas Lago and other
southerners, who still contradict the Josephson, westerner position.
Ivor Catt
01727 864257
121 Westfields, St. Albans AL3 4JR
@@@@@@@@@@@
http://www.suppressedscience.net/censorship-medicine.html
,
"It is a modern cliché that we live in an ‘Information Society’. We
drown in data, but scientific discussions that threaten vested interests are
lost at sea and scientists who insist on studying controversial theories are
cast adrift."
|